Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!
In latest years more than a few issues pertinent to the expansion of nursing information have been addressed. These comprise of uncovering experiences considered innermost to nursing and the nursing theories and models that have stemmed from them (Meleis 1997, Fawcett 1993, 1995, Chinn & Kramer 1995). Caring as an imperative perception within nursing is gaining increasing concentration in the text (Kyle 1995, Lea & Watson 1996, McCance et al. 1997). Additionally, a variety of theories have been offered in the prose, which have caring as a vital thought and are based on a human knowledge point of view.
These embrace Leininger’s (1991) Theory of Culture Care, Watson’s (1985) Theory of Human Caring, Boykin & Schoenhofer’s (1993) Theory of Nursing as Caring and Roach’s (1984) theory on caring. However, it is the intention within this paper to explain the theory of caring in nursing as in a form that focuses in the concept of transpersonal, humanity and caring health care providers. I will be using this theory on Acute Care Advance Nurse Practioner, in the Critical Care setting. Further I will draw comparisons transversely four caring theories as exposed in Table 1, with the aim of examining them in terms of their likenesses and disparities and to believe their helpfulness in nursing practice.
THEORIES ON CARING
The theoretical perceptions on caring have been explained in the text mutually as molds and as theories. McKenna (1997) highlights the uncertainty among these terms and classifies two schools of reflection in connection to the approach they are defined. Spot A backed by Fawcett (1995), supports a ladder of theoretical growth with a model measured more theoretical than a hypothesis. on the other hand, position B advocated by theorists such as Meleis (1997) and Stevens-Barnum (1994), advocates the view that all conceptualizations are hypothesis, but at diverse stages of progress.
WATSON’S THEORY OF HUMAN CARE
Jean Watson’s assumption on caring was first available in 1979 in a manuscript entitled Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring. This volume symbolized premature stages in the improvement of her hypothesis that was to be prolonged 6 years afterwards in Nursing: Human Science and Human Care (Watson 1985). Watson expresses nursing as a soul science, with the main spotlight being the practice of human care for persons, families and groups. Her hypothesis is based on a shape of humanism and has its beginning in metaphysics (viewpoint of life form and knowing).
The aim of nursing inside Watson’s (1985) caring theory, as offered in Table 1, has its axis about helping public to achieve a higher level of harmony within the intellect, body and spirit. She preserves that this purpose is achieved through caring business. Watson’s ten carative features, referred to as the interference of the theory, are accessible in Table 2. She in addition refers to transpersonal caring which is expressed as ‘an superlative of intersubjectivity in which in cooperation persons [nurse and tolerant] are drawn in’ (Watson 1985 p. 60). Transpersonal caring is established in an occurrence or genuine caring circumstance.
Neil & Schroeder (1992) and Schroeder (1993), who articulated the Denver Nursing Project, present an illustration of the sensible submission of Watson’s theory on individual caring. The scheme spotlights on an outpatient hub for people existing with HIV and AIDS which makes use of Watson’s effort as the foundation for teaching, clinical practice and follow a line of investigation. The job declaration for the Center reflects Watson’s philosophy, articulating ‘esteem for the exceptionality and independence of each human being and faith that fitness and comfort are multidimensional’ (Neil & Schroeder 1992 p. 105).
The thought that human being’s remedial processes can be supported through genuine caring relationships is also fundamental to the labor carried out in the Center. The force of the mission together in terms of price and in excellence of life for persons existing with HIV/AIDS has been assessed using equally qualitative and quantitative techniques. The consequences specified that the possible price savings of the Center are important due to, for instance, reduced length of rest home stay and nurses’ aptitude to put off hospital admittance. Findings from the assessment mission’s highlight, more prominently, the abridged level of person suffering resultant from a caring bond.
COMPARISON OF THEORIES
In order to contrast and contrast theories Stevens-Barnum (1994) talked about the exercise of ‘commonplaces’, a phrase that points to a expansive stadium without specifying its substance. When the elements of a number of theories are arranged into commonplaces, then it is probable to contrast and compare them.
In addition, she states that at the same time as hypothesis analysts make their individual sets of commonplaces there is no one correct set. The reality of this preserve noted if one looks at the job of nurse meta-theorists (Meleis 1997, Fawcett 1993, 1995, Steven-Barnum 1994, Marriner-Tomey 1994).
In relative to the assumptions on caring, Leininger and Watson’s hypothesis have been examined by Fitzpatrick & Whall (1996), Marriner-Tomey (1994), Fawcett (1993) and George (1995). Boykin & Schoenhofer’s effort, which is measured a fairly new caring theory, has only been evaluated in a new text by George (1995). This paper offers to judge against and contrast the ‘caring’ theories in relation to individuals commonplaces that the authors regard as relevant. Table 1 current the commonplaces used for association purposes, counting: origin of theory; scale of theory; classification of caring; explanation of nursing; key perceptions of the theory; and aim/outcome. in addition, ease is also considered and argued in relation to each hypothesis.
Span, according to McKenna (1997), relates to how the hypothesis can be functional and its quantity of abstractedness. On test of the four caring suppositions, Watson’s and Leininger’s theories are more superior in their growth than those of Roach and Boykin and Schoenhofer. This is obvious not only from the capacity of the theories, but also from a contrast of other standards.
For instance, Table 1 exemplifies that Roach and Boykin describe caring rather theoretically and Schoenhofer weighed against to those definitions offered by Leininger and Watson. Nevertheless, it should be prominent that there is incongruity among meta-theorists as to the capacity of Leininger and Watson’s theories. Fawcett (1993) categorizes Leininger’s conjecture as a magnificent theory and Watson’s as middle variety expressive theory. on the other hand, Marriner-Tomey (1994) analysis Leininger’s theory as a middle range supposition and Watson’s as a idea. While opinions differ from philosophies to magnificent theories to center range theories it would be factual to speak that Watson’s and Leininger’s works present caring in a lesser amount of conceptual way.
EXPLANATION OF CARING AND NURSING
The metaphors of caring accessible in Table 1, and as a result the meaning of nursing, imitate the humanistic environment of nursing. Nursing is also definite in terms of caring behavior that fit in a variety of skills. For instance, Watson (1985) highlights expert, personal, technical, aesthetic and moral human care dealings, while Roach (1984) things to see cognitive, effectual, scientific and managerial skills. Moreover, on assessment of definitions of gentle and nursing one can recognize a dual constituent to caring in treatment — attitudes and standards on one hand and actions on the other.
On appraisal of the explanation concepts inside Roach and Watson’s theories, the double constituent becomes obvious. For instance, Roach’s five Cs of caring include principles and capability, highlighting approach and knowledge. Likewise, Watson’s carative issues comprise values vital in the helping connection, in concert with the skills obligatory in nursing such as crisis solving and the stipulation of physical care. A closing point to be stressed is the significance and assessment placed on the nurse-patient bond contained by the four theories on caring. This places interest on the essential human aspect within nursing and, as confirmed formerly, the humanistic focal point of these presumptions.
While the beginning of the caring theories vary to some extent, they all draw from from human skill regulations such as anthropology. It is also obvious that everyone has been based upon the principle that nursing is a soul science. Watson (1985 p. 16) draws a quantity of main beliefs on which a human science background is founded:
- a viewpoint of human independence, choice, accountability;
- a natural science and psychology of holism (non-reducible people interrelated with others and environment);
- an epistemology that permits not just for empirics, but for expansion of aesthetics, moral values, instinct, and process finding;
- an ontology of point in time and liberty;
- a background of inter-human proceedings, courses, and associations;
- a logical world vision that is unbolted.
Watson (1985) plainly states that the importance structure relating to her assumption is based on the standards fundamental to human care and individual science in nursing. Likewise, Boykin and Schoenhofer (1993 p. 15) affirm that their presumption views nursing as a shape of human discipline that ‘focuses on the information needed to comprehend the comprehensiveness of what it means to be individual and on the techniques to confirm this knowledge’.
Leininger (1991) and Roach (1984), while not openly stating the sight that nursing is a person discipline, show ideas regular with this idea. Roach rows that caring is the person mode of life form, with nursing as the specialization of human caring. Leininger also analysis caring as a ‘humanistic form of life form’ and basis her effort on holism and the idea that caring can only be exposed from an emic or people-based standpoint.
The genesis from which the four theories are resultant and the following method in which caring in nursing is distinct has suggestions for the learning of caring. It may be obliging to inspect this from the viewpoint of Parse’s (1987) entirety and simultaneity paradigms. The whole paradigm spotlights on the normal science outlook and varies from the simultaneity paradigm in three noteworthy ways — in the postulations about the self and fitness, in relative to the aim of nursing, and in the suggestions for research and application.
The simultaneity pattern views the individual as further than and diverse from the addition of the parts, as a release being free to prefer, who gives importance to situations. Healthiness is measured within the simultaneity model as a development of flattering and as a position of value precedence’s and the purpose of nursing focuses on the eminence of living from the person’s point of view.
Therefore, performance nursing from a thoughtful or human science perception is dependable with the simultaneity exemplar. The ambition/outcome in three of the four theories (Roach does not visibly utter an ending) places prominence on civilizing and enhancing care from the angle of the tolerant. This has allegations for the learning of caring which, to be factual to the simultaneity pattern, would supports qualitative advancements.
Interior arrangement, according to McKenna (1997), comprises concerns relating to clearness and straightforwardness. It is planned to inspect how each of the four theories reproduce effortlessness. This was selected because, as McKenna (1997 p. 227) states, ‘if we wish for theory, performance and investigations to link properly, theory should be effortlessly implicit if it is to expand the awareness and assurance of hard pushed clinicians’.
The complication of Leininger’s theory is manifest when evaluating the abundant concepts considered fundamental to her exertion. Alexander et al. (1993) observed that the supposition is not undemanding and calls for knowledge and positive reception of transcultural and anthropological imminents. George (1995) also sustained that it is neither effortless nor simply unspoken, particularly upon first understanding. Nevertheless, she hassles that formerly the interrelationships among concepts are grabbed, simplicity is more obvious.
Underneath this, Leininger herself summits that once her scholar and postgraduate nursing learners have conceptualized the assumption, they locate it ‘highly realistic, related, and more trouble-free than intricate’ (Alexander et al. 1989 p. 436). Shortly, Leininger maintained this proclamation in her 1995 wording where she explains that ‘nurses are considering many benefits of using the hypothesis to build up and give culture-specific care and care that is significant to consumers who are ethnically unlike’ (Leininger 1995 p. 110).
In that it illustrates on a numeral of other disciplines, Watson’s conjecture is comparable to that of Leininger’s. For the reason that, Barnhart et al. (1994) disagree that the person who reads must have an accepting of a multiplicity of subject matter in order to realize the theory. In disparity, Talento (1995) regards Watson’s theory to be uncomplicated because it uses theories from added orders, which she feels are known to nurses.
Nevertheless, nurses’ fluency with all the concepts contained by Watson’s theory, principally the existential-phenomenological factor, would be open to query. This tip is tinted by both Barnhart et al. (1994) and Talento (1995) who have the same opinion that nurses may not encompass the open-minded arts background to give the groundwork for accepting some of Watson’s principles. Additionally, Sourial (1996) in her examination of Watson’s hypothesis highlights criticisms aimed at at the speech Watson uses in her theorizing.
The enlargement of detailed theories center on caring in nursing is analytical of the ever-increasing acknowledgment being given to caring as an inner impression within the restraint. The examination of four caring theories inside this paper highlights a numeral of similarities and dissimilarity. An exam of the source of these theories show that they are beached in humanism and the idea that caring in nursing is footed on a person science standpoints. in addition, the images of nursing and caring inside the theories imitate a dual constituent to nursing — viewpoint/values and actions.
The humanistic character of nursing as replicated inside these theories has a pressure on the schemes used to discover their consequence to nursing, helping chiefly qualitative advances. Besides, they’re supposed simplicity and utilization in nursing would come out to depend on nurses having or acquiring familiarity in other controls such as anthropology and way of life. For that reason, the education of the crucial concepts within these theories is significant if they are to be used in real world. One can terminate that the sympathetic of the ideas obtainable in these hypothesis and their victorious submission in practice is vital if caring is measured a fundamental part of the nurse’s responsibility.
Alexander J.E., Beagle C.J., Butler P. et al. (1994) Madeleine Leininger: Cultural Care Theory. In Nursing Theorists and Their Work 3rd edn (Marriner-Tomey A. ed.), Mosby, St Louis, pp. 423-444.
Barnhart D.A., Bennet P.M., Porter B.D. & Sloan R.S. (1994) Jean Watson: Philosophy and Science of Caring. In Nursing Theorists and Their Work 3rd edn (Marriner-Tomey A. ed.), Mosby, St Louis, pp. 148-162.
Barry C. & Kronk P. (1993) Nursing Guatemalan families using Leininger’s Culture Care Theory. In Patterns of Nursing Theories in Practice (Parker M.E. ed.), National League for Nursing Press, New York, pp. 142-156.
Boykin A. & Schoenhofer S. (1993) Nursing as Caring: A Model for Transforming Practice. National League for Nursing Press, New York.
Chinn P.L. & Kramer M.K. (1995) Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach 4th edn. Mosby Year Book, St Louis.
Cohen J.A. (1991) Two portraits of caring: a comparison of the artists, Leininger and Watson. Journal of Advanced Nursing 16, 899-909.
Fawcett J. (1993) Analysis and Evaluation of Nursing Theories. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.
Fawcett J. (1995) Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing 3rd edn. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.
Fitzpatrick J.J. & Whall A.L. (1996) Conceptual Models of Nursing: Analysis and Application 3rd edn. Appleton & Lange, Stamford.
George J.B. (1995) Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice 4th edn. Prentice-Hall International, London.
Kearney C. & Yeagar V. (1993) Practical applications of nursing as caring theory. In Parker, M.E. Patterns of Nursing Theories in Practice (Parker M.E. ed.), National League for Nursing Press, New York, pp. 93-102.
Kyle T.V. (1995) The concept of caring: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21, 506-514.
Lea A. & Watson R. (1996) Caring research and concepts: a selected review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing 5, 71-77.
Leininger M.M. (1985) Transcultural care diversity and universality: a theory of nursing. Nursing & Health Care 6, 209-212.
Leininger M.M. (1988) Leininger’s Theory of Nursing: cultural care diversity and universality. Nursing Science Quarterly 1, 152-160.
Leininger M.M. (1991) Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing. National League of Nursing Press, New York.
Leininger M. (1995) Transcultural Nursing: Concepts, Theories Research & Practice 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Marriner-Tomey A. (1994) Nursing Theorists and Their Work 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis.
Mayeroff M. (1971) On Caring. Harper Row, London.
Meleis A.I. (1997) Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, London.
McCance T.V., McKenna H.P. & Boore J.R.P. (1997) Caring: dealing with a difficult concept. International Journal of Nursing Studies 34, 241-248.
McKenna H.P. (1997) Nursing Theories and Models. Routledge, London.
Neil R.M. & Schroeder C.A. (1992) Evaluation research within the human caring framework. In The Presence of Caring in Nursing (Gaut D.A. ed.), National League for Nursing, New York, pp. 103-111.
Parse R.R. (1987) Nursing Science: Major Paradigms, Theories and Critiques. W.B. Saunders, London.
Roach S. (1984) Caring: The Human Mode of Being. University of Toronto, Toronto.
Roach S. (1987) The Human Act of Caring. Canadian Hospital Association, Ottawa.
Schroeder C. (1993) Cost effectiveness of a theory-based nurse-managed centre for persons living with HIV/AIDS. In Patterns of Nursing Theories in Practice (Parker M.E. ed.), National League for Nursing Press, New York, pp. 159-179.
Sourial S. (1996) An analysis and evaluation of Watson’s theory of human care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 400-404.
Stevens-Barnum B.J.S. (1994) Nursing Theory: Analysis, Application, Evaluation 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Talento B. (1995) Jean Watson. In Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice 4th edn. (George J.B. ed.), Prentice-Hall, London, pp. 317-334.
Watson J. (1979) Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring. Little Brown, Boston.
Watson J. (1985) Nursing: Human Science and Human Care -A Theory of Nursing. National League of Nursing Press, New York.